RSS feed for this blog

Automated Content Access Protocol (ACAP)

By Paul Watson on .

OK, well I’ve spent some time reviewing this new specification.

It’s a mixture of a couple of useful new qualifiers to the old robots.txt standard and a lot of anally-retentive control-freakery written by people who still don’t get “the internet”.

The good points:

The bloody terrible points (control-freakery and lack of understanding):

Thankfully there is no legal requirement that the search engines take any notice whatsoever of this new “technical framework”.

I kinda hope that the tech community takes the good points out of this spec (pattern-matching, time constraints etc) and just upgrades the good old robots.txt standard, ignoring the worts excesses of control-freakery that the publishing industry have slipped in.

a bit of blog reaction to ACAP:

“…Boiled down to the bottom line, I can’t help but sense that the intended shift in responsibility that appears to be associated with ACAP could lead to an entire new wave of litigation and possible information restrictions — enriching lawyers to be sure — but quite possibly being a significant negative development for Internet users in general.”

Lauren Weinstein

“…The new protocol focuses entirely on the desires of publishers, and only those publishers who fear what web users will do with the content if they don’t retain control over it at every point…ACAP might well be adopted by a lot of publishers (although not, so far, by any search engines anyone has heard of), but we’ll all be a little poorer as a result.”

Ian Douglas, Daily Telegraph

“It seems like a weak electronic online DRM – with the vague promise that in the future more ‘stuff’ will be published, precisely because you can do less with it…”

Martin Belam

In the interests of fairness I tried to find a positive article about ACAP, but there’s absolutely nothing.

Luckily this ACAP protocol does not have the support of the search engines and so is likely to fail and die.

The ACAP site does brag that “Major search engines are engaged in the project. Exalead, the world’s fourth largest search engine has been a full participant in the project.”

Exalead? Who the hell are they? If you can’t claim the involvement of Google and/or Yahoo if any search-engine specific project then you’re dead on your feet.

And in the case of ACAP, I’m glad.